You do have the option of other bands, including some snazzier leather straps, but the proprietary band system means you have to go with whatever Fitbit has on offer. Perhaps that's the one break in the all-day chain. We don't think the Ionic is as ugly as some people have claimed, but it would be hard to pull this off with fancy formal wear. The Ionic still looks like a fitness tracker, with an angular design resembling the Blaze before it, and a slanted aluminium case built by a nano-molding technique we've seen in smartphones, but not wearables. A lot of work has gone into keeping the Ionic thin and light while cramming in GPS, long battery life, a tri-wavelength sensor and a 1,000-nit display, but it seems to have come at the expense of design. The Ionic may trump any number of smartwatches out there in some categories, but looks isn't one of them. Read on to get our thoughts on the current state of the Ionic. We've been putting the Ionic through its paces for a while now, and since launch Fitbit rolled out a couple of significant updates, including an app store. The Fitbit Ionic – and its sportier cousin the Fitbit Ionic Adidas Edition – is going head-to-head with the Apple Watch Series 3, and while it doesn't have LTE to offer, it has the upper hand in some other areas. But like saying Voldemort's name, Fitbit refuses to use the word smartwatch when talking about the Blaze, presumably for fear that market analysts would then compare shipments against the Apple Watch.īut now, it's game on. In a sense, the Ionic is the archetype of a trend we're seeing in which fitness trackers and smartwatches blur together.Īfter all, many would call the Fitbit Blaze a smartwatch, and you wouldn't be wrong. Neither the Apple Watch, nor any member of the Wear OS watch congregation can claim to do this to the same degree right now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |